[LinuxPPS] [PATCH] time_pps_readlink()
Udo van den Heuvel
udovdh at xs4all.nl
Sat Aug 26 19:14:37 CEST 2006
Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
>> --- a/ntpd/refclock_nmea.c 2006-05-22 16:39:06.000000000 +0200
>> +++ b/ntpd/refclock_nmea.c 2006-05-22 16:39:54.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -139,6 +139,9 @@
>> register struct nmeaunit *up;
>> struct refclockproc *pp;
>> int fd;
>> +#ifdef PPS_HAVE_FINDSOURCE
>> + char id[40], path[40];
>
> I think is better using "LINUXPPS_MAX_NAME_LEN" define instead of "40"
> (see "ppstest.c").
I guess the valoe of 32 of that constant is OK. Just a long name.. :-)
>> + /* Get the PPS source's real name */
>> + time_pps_readlink(link, 40, path, 40);
>
> Where do you init the "link" variable? In "ppstest.c" I did:
I think this is my big mistake.
> char id[STRING_LEN] = "", /* no ID string by default */
> path[STRING_LEN],
> link[STRING_LEN] = "/dev/gps0"; /* just a default device */
I corrected it now.
> Mmm... doing like this is correct but you are using the internal
> rappresentation of "handle" variable. I think you should define
> another variable to be used as open/close flag so you can significally
> reduce the #ifdef lines since the new flag can be used for both
> LinuxPPS and the current PPS API.
Hmmm. I would have to look into that so I can understand what you mean.
Making the patch smaller and smaller and better is a good goal.
Please enlighten.
BTW: ntp 4.2.2p3 now works with the attached patch.
Thanks,
Udo
-------------- next part --------------
--- a/ntpd/refclock_nmea.c 2006-05-22 16:39:06.000000000 +0200
+++ b/ntpd/refclock_nmea.c 2006-05-22 16:39:54.000000000 +0200
@@ -139,6 +139,11 @@
register struct nmeaunit *up;
struct refclockproc *pp;
int fd;
+#ifdef PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH
+ char id[LINUXPPS_MAX_NAME_LEN] = "",
+ path[LINUXPPS_MAX_NAME_LEN],
+ link[LINUXPPS_MAX_NAME_LEN] = "/dev/gps0"; /* just a default device */
+#endif /* PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH */
char device[20];
/*
@@ -230,8 +235,24 @@
* Start the PPSAPI interface if it is there. Default to use
* the assert edge and do not enable the kernel hardpps.
*/
+#ifdef PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH
+ /* Get the PPS source's real name */
+ time_pps_readlink(link, LINUXPPS_MAX_NAME_LEN, path, LINUXPPS_MAX_NAME_LEN);
+
+ /* Try to find the source */
+ fd = time_pps_findpath(path, LINUXPPS_MAX_NAME_LEN, id, LINUXPPS_MAX_NAME_LEN);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ msyslog(LOG_ERR, "refclock: cannot find PPS path \"%s\" in the system", path);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ msyslog(LOG_INFO, "refclock: found PPS source \"%s\" at id #%d on \"%s\"", path, fd, id);
+#endif /* PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH */
if (time_pps_create(fd, &up->handle) < 0) {
+#ifdef PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH
+ up->handle.socket = -1;
+#else
up->handle = 0;
+#endif /* PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH */
msyslog(LOG_ERR,
"refclock_nmea: time_pps_create failed: %m");
return (1);
@@ -257,7 +278,9 @@
pp = peer->procptr;
up = (struct nmeaunit *)pp->unitptr;
#ifdef HAVE_PPSAPI
+#ifndef PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH
if (up->handle != 0)
+#endif /* PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH */
time_pps_destroy(up->handle);
#endif /* HAVE_PPSAPI */
io_closeclock(&pp->io);
@@ -366,7 +389,11 @@
/*
* Convert the timespec nanoseconds field to ntp l_fp units.
*/
+#ifdef PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH
+ if (up->handle.socket == -1)
+#else
if (up->handle == 0)
+#endif /* PPS_HAVE_FINDPATH */
return (0);
timeout.tv_sec = 0;
timeout.tv_nsec = 0;
More information about the LinuxPPS
mailing list