[LinuxPPS] Tentative Success using git:linuxpps and ntp-4.2.4
; and a question
Udo van den Heuvel
udovdh at xs4all.nl
Thu Jan 25 17:31:53 CET 2007
Scott Doty wrote:
[interesting info snipped]
> Here's the thing, though -- when I run ntptime, I get:
>
> _[/root]_(root at time2.sr)_
> # ntptime
> ntp_gettime() returns code 0 (OK)
> time c963511c.98a60000 Thu, Jan 25 2007 7:54:04.596, (.596283),
> maximum error 8817 us, estimated error 18 us
> ntp_adjtime() returns code 0 (OK)
> modes 0x0 (),
> offset 2486.000 us, frequency 40.875 ppm, interval 1 s,
> maximum error 8817 us, estimated error 18 us,
> status 0x1 (PLL),
> time constant 4, precision 1.000 us, tolerance 512 ppm,
>
> With PPSKit, this would mention "PPS" in the status -- does this look like
> the PPS signal is working?
I think so but I am more familiar with `ntpq -pn`.
Can you post that output?
> refclock_nmea: cannot find PPS path "ttyS0" in the system
>
> The solution: I had a symlink /dev/gps0 -> ttyS0 -- to fix, the full path must be in the
> symlink target,e.g.: # cd /dev ; ln -sf /dev/ttyS0 gps0
Correct.
I also had to fix that problem.
> Also, I was showing double-digit estimated errors until I
> did a "setserial /dev/gps0 low_latency" -- not sure if that
It is a good one!
More information about the LinuxPPS
mailing list