[LinuxPPS] Re: Something Funny going on with linuxPPS.
Rodolfo Giometti
giometti at enneenne.com
Thu Oct 18 09:13:58 CEST 2007
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:56:13PM -0600, clemens at dwf.com wrote:
> OK, First the version.
> I appear to be running the ntp-pps-2.6.23-rc2.diff with linux-2.6.22 and
> the patch-2.6.23-rc6 .
>
> So Im running the LinuxPPS rc2 patch with rc6.
>
> With a test program that just prints out the time hacks (if they have changed)
As test program you mean "ppstest"?
> I see:
>
> reg> [root at deneb Testing]# pps*4
> fd2 = 3
> getcap says 0x1133
> getparam is 0x1113
> set mode to 0x1113
> getparam is 0x1113
> Enter loop
>
> A: 1192653829.3294954939 #437782
> C: 1192653828.198436560 #437781
> A: 1192653830.3294955022 #437783
> C: 1192653829.198489907 #437782
> A: 1192653831.3294955257 #437784
> C: 1192653830.198540585 #437783
> A: 1192653832.3294954727 #437785
> C: 1192653831.198591520 #437784
> A: 1192653833.3294955284 #437786
> C: 1192653832.198644426 #437785
> A: 1192653834.3294954791 #437787
> C: 1192653833.198695348 #437786
> A: 1192653835.3294955233 #437788
> C: 1192653834.198746540 #437787
>
> Note that the Assert for second 829.3 is followed by the Clear for second
> 828.19
> This cant happen.
> These time hacks MUST be in ascending order !!!
>
> Somehow the Clear timehacks seem to be 2sec behind where they should be
> relative to the Assert timehacks.
>
> I apologize for not having had time to actually LOOK at the code, but
> Im officially retired now and should have more time for things like this.
> Just once I get the stacks piled up on my desk cleared off...
I don't understand what you mean. In your log I see that both assert
and clear events _are_ in ascending order. Of course you must consider
them separately... :)
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti at enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti at gnudd.com
Embedded Systems giometti at linux.it
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
More information about the LinuxPPS
mailing list