[LinuxPPS] Performance of 2.6.23.12
Heiko Gerstung
heiko.gerstung at meinberg.de
Thu Jan 10 08:43:39 CET 2008
Udo van den Heuvel schrieb:
> Heiko Gerstung wrote:
>
>> After looking at my ntpq -p stats for a while I see that PPS performance
>> is not acceptable so far. I see an offset of more than 5 ms between my
>> GPS string and the Atom driver. Additionally the jitter of the Atom PPS
>> seems to be very high (more than 2ms). The same hardware configuration
>> works fine with 2.6.15.1 and PPSKit Light from U.Windl.
>>
>> I would be grateful for hints how I can fine tune this and where to look
>> at. Is there a kernel config option I should check?
>>
>
> There is some timing-related options.
> I don't know them all.
> But I'd say the tickless option is not good.
>
> A complete list for timing-related tuning would be very welcome!
>
Yes, that would definitely help. I will see what I can do in regards to
this.
If anyone reading this can post the performance of his machine(s) and
include LinuxPPS version, Kernel version, Refclock driver and ntpd
Version, I would appreciate that.
Best Regards,
Heiko
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxPPS mailing list
> LinuxPPS at ml.enneenne.com
> http://ml.enneenne.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxpps
> Wiki: http://wiki.enneenne.com/index.php/LinuxPPS_support
>
More information about the LinuxPPS
mailing list