[LinuxPPS] [alpha PATCH] Low level IRQ support.
Udo van den Heuvel
udovdh at xs4all.nl
Fri May 2 14:08:57 CEST 2008
Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> here my proposal for the low level IRQ support.
Thanks very much! That was quick.
> Currently I've no hardware to test it so please do it by yourself and
> report results.
The patch applies well to 2.6.25.1.
It compiles fine.
> I've added the new configuration option "Use low level IRQ
> timestamps", I'd like to know differences between using or not using
> it!
My reception is not very good but I can at least do some basic tests.
ntpd appears to work, shortly after startup:
# ntpq -pn
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
==============================================================================
127.127.1.0 .LOCL. 15 l 40 64 1 0.000 0.000
0.001
*127.127.20.0 .GPS. 14 l 6 16 37 0.000 4.747
2.506
127.127.22.0 .PPS. 0 l 5 16 3 0.000 4.788
0.632
194.109.22.18 193.79.237.14 2 u 48 64 1 8.125 4.224
0.001
# grep PPS .config
# PPS support
CONFIG_PPS=y
CONFIG_PPS_IRQ_EVENTS=y
# CONFIG_PPS_DEBUG is not set
# PPS clients support
CONFIG_PPS_CLIENT_KTIMER=m
CONFIG_PPS_CLIENT_UART=y
# CONFIG_PPS_CLIENT_LP is not set
If you have suggestions to (better) compare old and new behaviour,
please let me know.
Kind regards,
Udo
More information about the LinuxPPS
mailing list