[LinuxPPS] Which patch to use?

[Udo van den Heuvel]

Jordan Hayes wrote:
> Then when I start ntpd, I get this:
> 
> ntpd[2213]: refclock_nmea: found GPS source "/dev/gps0"
> ntpd[2213]: refclock_nmea: try alternate PPS device "/dev/pps0"
> ntpd[2213]: refclock_nmea: found PPS source "/dev/pps0"
> ntpd[2213]: refclock_nmea: time_pps_kcbind failed: Operation not 
> supported
> 
> Which all looks great.

Different from here:
May  2 14:04:50 epia ntpd[7661]: refclock_nmea: found GPS source "/dev/gps0"
May  2 14:04:50 epia ntpd[7661]: refclock_nmea: try "/dev/gpspps0" for PPS
May  2 14:04:50 epia ntpd[7661]: refclock_nmea: found PPS source
"/dev/gpspps0"
May  2 14:04:50 epia ntpd[7661]: refclock_atom: time_pps_kcbind failed:
Operation not supported

No /dev/gpspps0 ?

# ls -l /dev/*ps*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      5 2008-05-02 13:58 /dev/gps0 -> ttyS0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      4 2008-05-02 14:04 /dev/gpspps0 -> pps0
crw-rw---- 1 root tty  254, 0 2008-05-02 14:04 /dev/pps0


Right reflcock_nmea patch used?
Does the ATOM driver work OK?