[LinuxPPS] cross posting [time-nuts] NTP API on Linux 2.6.26

[Remco dB]

All, 

I think the following posting is of interest to us. 
I remember someone patched timex.h to use nano precision with LinuxPPS.

Remco

-------------------------------

Magnus Danielson magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Wed Jan 7 04:48:13 UTC 2009

    * Previous message: [time-nuts] Standards sought for immunity of shielded 
cable links to power-frequency ground loops
    * Next message: [time-nuts] NTP API on Linux 2.6.26
    * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

As I have been investigating the ways of NTPD to fiddle with time in the 
LINUX kernel I discovered that /usr/include/linux/timex.h (as supplied 
by the kernel) is not in sync with /usr/include/sys/timex.h (as supplied 
by glibc 2.7). Since it is the sys/timex.h which is the interface to 
NTPD and anyone else (it is actually a neat little interface if 
correctly supported).

The fluke is that glibc duplicates the timex.h but has not been updated 
since oh... Linux 2.2.0. The linux/timex.h is up to date with the NTP 
API as far as I can see (have not checked the details).

There are some links that may be handy:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=165913&action=view
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9690
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2008-03/msg00076.html

However a small test-program:
#include <stdio.h>
//#include <sys/timex.h>
#include "timex.h"

int main()
{
	struct timex foo;
	adjtimex(&foo);
	printf("TAI Offset %i\n", foo.tai);
	return 0;
}

(Notice my quick and dirty hack to use a hacked variant of timex.h as if 
the patch was being applied, also notice that the .c part does not apply 
to the adjtimex() call but to the ntp_gettime() call which I am not 
using, so I do not require that patch for this purpose.)

This should be the kernels feeling of the TAI-UTC difference. I do not 
think it reflects that:
magnus at heaven:~/gcc/ntptest$ ./tai
TAI Offset -1553771440
magnus at heaven:~/gcc/ntptest$ ./tai
TAI Offset -263060400
magnus at heaven:~/gcc/ntptest$ ./tai
TAI Offset 238212176
magnus at heaven:~/gcc/ntptest$ ./tai
TAI Offset 658158672
magnus at heaven:~/gcc/ntptest$ ./tai
TAI Offset 1551639632

So I guess there is more to it than that patch alone.

If someone could run the above test-program on some *BSD box or whatever 
implementing the NTP API version 4 I would be interested in seeing what 
the result would be. It surely isn't the definitive test on the API, but 
seems to detect one (of possible several) flaws.

Cheers,
Magnus