[LinuxPPS] Why is my ATOM clock a falseticker?
Paul Simons
paul at thesimonet.org
Fri Jan 30 23:46:39 CET 2009
Oops, here is the relevant section:
server 127.127.22.1 minpoll 4 maxpoll 4 # ATOM (PPS)
fudge 127.127.22.1 flag2 1 # Use the "clear" edge of the signal
# "PPS pulses are usually short, and the leading edge is the on-time mark,
# so by looking at the time of two adjacent edges with cat /sys/class/pps/pps1/{assert,clear},
# you can see which one leads the other."
server 127.127.5.0 prefer # TrueTime clock
#No fudge
On 01/30/2009, "Cirilo Bernardo" stated:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Paul Simons <paul at thesimonet.org> wrote:
>> First, this list is great. Thank you for your conversation and willingness
>> to share. I took my Truetime 486-DC to a hardware type and he hooked a
>> oscilloscope to the pps and declared it a decent RS232 signal (0/+5v,
>> 200ms). I stopped playing with the parallel port and wired it directly to
>> the serial port. I applied Folkert's patch to ppsldisc. I downloaded and
>> built the latest NTP (4.2.5p157) with the right timex.h and against librt:
>>
> [snip]
>
> Did you use the "prefer" keyword? What does your ntp config file look like?
>
> - Cirilo
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ml.enneenne.com/pipermail/linuxpps/attachments/20090130/82709a31/attachment.htm
More information about the LinuxPPS
mailing list