[LinuxPPS] Confused with ppstest.c on 2.6.31
Luca Bertagnolio
time at berta.com
Tue Nov 24 16:46:06 CET 2009
Hi all,
been updating my Gentoo test machines with a 2.6.31-gentoo-r6 kernel with the
latest patch from Rodolfo. Everything compiles nicely, and I get the modules
that load OK in the kernel.
On the other hand, I am running into issue in compiling the silly ppstest.c
software found in the Documentation directory in the kernel sources.
Irregardless of whether I include the linux/asm/asm-generic links in
/usr/include
I cannot seem to get ppstest.c to compile.
If I don't have the links this is what I get:
tix pps # make
cc -Wall -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I . -I ../../include/ -ggdb ppstest.c
-o ppstest
In file included from /usr/include/asm/types.h:4,
from ../../include/linux/types.h:4,
from ./timepps.h:27,
from ppstest.c:8:
../../include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:11:29: error: asm/bitsperlong.h:
No such file or directory
make: *** [ppstest] Error 1
If I have the links this is what I get, much longer yet still
meaningless to my eyes:
tix pps # make
cc -Wall -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I . -I ../../include/ -ggdb ppstest.c
-o ppstest
In file included from /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25,
from /usr/include/errno.h:36,
from ./timepps.h:24,
from ppstest.c:8:
../../include/linux/errno.h:4:23: error: asm/errno.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/sys/ioctl.h:27,
from ./timepps.h:26,
from ppstest.c:8:
/usr/include/bits/ioctls.h:24:24: error: asm/ioctls.h: No such file or directory
In file included from ./timepps.h:27,
from ppstest.c:8:
../../include/linux/types.h:4:23: error: asm/types.h: No such file or directory
In file included from ../../include/linux/types.h:14,
from ./timepps.h:27,
from ppstest.c:8:
../../include/linux/posix_types.h:47:29: error: asm/posix_types.h: No
such file or directory
In file included from ./timepps.h:27,
from ppstest.c:8:
../../include/linux/types.h:168: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm'
or '__attribute__' before '__le16'
../../include/linux/types.h:169: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm'
or '__attribute__' before '__be16'
../../include/linux/types.h:170: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm'
or '__attribute__' before '__le32'
../../include/linux/types.h:171: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm'
or '__attribute__' before '__be32'
../../include/linux/types.h:172: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm'
or '__attribute__' before '__le64'
../../include/linux/types.h:173: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm'
or '__attribute__' before '__be64'
../../include/linux/types.h:175: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm'
or '__attribute__' before '__sum16'
../../include/linux/types.h:176: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm'
or '__attribute__' before '__wsum'
In file included from ./timepps.h:28,
from ppstest.c:8:
../../include/linux/pps.h:54: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before '__s64'
../../include/linux/pps.h:61: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before '__u32'
In file included from ../../include/linux/pps.h:117,
from ./timepps.h:28,
from ppstest.c:8:
../../include/linux/ioctl.h:4:23: error: asm/ioctl.h: No such file or directory
In file included from ppstest.c:8:
./timepps.h: In function 'time_pps_create':
./timepps.h:91: error: 'EINVAL' undeclared (first use in this function)
./timepps.h:91: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./timepps.h:91: error: for each function it appears in.)
./timepps.h:98: warning: implicit declaration of function '_IOR'
./timepps.h:98: error: expected expression before 'struct'
./timepps.h:100: error: 'EOPNOTSUPP' undeclared (first use in this function)
./timepps.h: In function 'time_pps_getparams':
./timepps.h:123: error: expected expression before 'struct'
./timepps.h:127: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'sec'
./timepps.h:128: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'nsec'
./timepps.h:129: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'sec'
./timepps.h:130: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'nsec'
./timepps.h: In function 'time_pps_setparams':
./timepps.h:142: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'sec'
./timepps.h:143: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'nsec'
./timepps.h:144: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'sec'
./timepps.h:145: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'nsec'
./timepps.h:147: warning: implicit declaration of function '_IOW'
./timepps.h:147: error: expected expression before 'struct'
./timepps.h: In function 'time_pps_getcap':
./timepps.h:153: error: expected expression before 'int'
./timepps.h: In function 'time_pps_fetch':
./timepps.h:165: error: 'EINVAL' undeclared (first use in this function)
./timepps.h:170: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'sec'
./timepps.h:171: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'nsec'
./timepps.h:172: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'flags'
./timepps.h:174: error: 'struct pps_ktime' has no member named 'flags'
./timepps.h:176: warning: implicit declaration of function '_IOWR'
./timepps.h:176: error: expected expression before 'struct'
./timepps.h:178: error: 'struct pps_kinfo' has no member named 'assert_sequence'
./timepps.h:179: error: 'struct pps_kinfo' has no member named 'clear_sequence'
./timepps.h:180: error: 'struct pps_kinfo' has no member named 'assert_tu'
./timepps.h:181: error: 'struct pps_kinfo' has no member named 'assert_tu'
./timepps.h:182: error: 'struct pps_kinfo' has no member named 'clear_tu'
./timepps.h:183: error: 'struct pps_kinfo' has no member named 'clear_tu'
./timepps.h:184: error: 'struct pps_kinfo' has no member named 'current_mode'
./timepps.h: In function 'time_pps_kcbind':
./timepps.h:194: error: 'EOPNOTSUPP' undeclared (first use in this function)
ppstest.c: In function 'fetch_source':
ppstest.c:87: error: 'EINTR' undeclared (first use in this function)
ppstest.c: In function 'main':
ppstest.c:140: error: 'ETIMEDOUT' undeclared (first use in this function)
make: *** [ppstest] Error 1
Was ppsetest.c tested with the new patches? Or is this something local to
my specific setup?
I am using glibc 2.10.1 with timex.h patched to add NANO and TAI, though
I don't believe that there is much relationship here, with the apparently
simple compilation of ppstest.c...
Any hints for me?
Thanks, Luca
More information about the LinuxPPS
mailing list