On 2012-03-18 12:28, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > On 2012-03-18 11:09, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: >> Why the PPSFREQ/PPSTIME omission? > > On the box without PPSFREQ/PPSTIME is at kernel 3.0.9, the working one > is at 3.2.4. Is that a factor? And this one? See https://support.ntp.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1460 Where would the truth be? Udo