[LinuxPPS] linuxpps and devicetree support
Jan Lübbe
jlu at pengutronix.de
Fri Apr 26 10:37:40 CEST 2013
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 17:37 +1000, Damien Dusha wrote:
> My hack-up had the following for an i.mx53-based board, but I am yet
> to test it:
>
> pps at gps0 {
> compatible = "pps-gpio";
> gpios = <&gpio0 2 0>;
> assert-falling-edge = 1;
> capture-clear = 1;
> };
>
>
> What's your opinion on explicit values for the flags vs the mere
> existance of the flags?
Usually in DT, boolean options are defined simply by existence.
Is there a preexisting terminology for things like which edge to
capture, polarity, assert/clear in the PPS area? Do we really need more
than whether the rising or falling edge is aligned to the second?
Regards,
Jan
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the discussions
mailing list