[LinuxPPS] LinuxPPS, kernel 4.4, ntpd 4.2.8
Joachim Fabini
Joachim.Fabini at tuwien.ac.at
Wed Jan 11 18:20:08 CET 2017
On 11.01.2017 17:24, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> On 10-01-17 20:14, Joachim Fabini wrote:
>> Can someone familiar with LinuxPPS and/or ntp confirm this diagnosis? Or
>> disprove it? This means that ntp 4.2.8 _could_ provide PPS functionality
>> in theory but in practice it does NOT because a developer has decided
>> (for whatever reason that is not known to me) to remove a conditional.
>
> If I understand your explanation correctly when can patch the
> conditional back in and then we should see a functional 4.2.8.
Yes, you're right.
> If you can test that you can prove that just the conditional is the
> issue here.
I compiled ntp 4.2.8 yesterday with the conditional patch and tried it
on two distinct Ubuntu 16.04 servers. Both seem to synchronize to the
NMEA/PPS clock. Current output (both external time servers are in the
campus network):
$ ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
oGPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 5 16 377 0.000 -0.001 0.001
+ntp1.x.y.z .GPS. 1 u 44 64 377 0.774 -0.017 0.072
+ntp2.x.y.z 1.2.3.4 2 u 64 64 377 0.787 -0.008 0.038
$ ntptime
ntp_gettime() returns code 0 (OK)
time dc20de81.6476f2a8 Wed, Jan 11 2017 17:40:33.392, (.392440331),
maximum error 5500 us, estimated error 0 us, TAI offset 0
ntp_adjtime() returns code 0 (OK)
modes 0x0 (),
offset 0.154 us, frequency -5.449 ppm, interval 1 s,
maximum error 5500 us, estimated error 0 us,
status 0x2007 (PLL,PPSFREQ,PPSTIME,NANO),
time constant 4, precision 0.001 us, tolerance 500 ppm,
One thing that I've noticed for 4.2.8 is the missing log entry in
var/log/syslog. ntp 4.2.6 reports on restart whenever it finds and uses
the gps/pps source.
With ntpd 4.2.8 on Linux there are two cases: it either stops using the
GPS/PPS clock, case in which it logs the error "refclock_params:
time_pps_kcbind: Operation not supported" (original code). Or,
alternatively, with the proposed conditional patch, it keeps silent (but
uses NMEA/PPS according to ntpq/ntptime reports).
> My Fedora 24 is at 4.2.6 still. Rawhide has ntp 4.2.8.
Seems similar to Ubuntu - 12.04 and 14.04 ship 4.2.6p5 with security
patches, 16.04 has updated to 4.2.8.
thanks,
Joachim
More information about the discussions
mailing list